Copyright and citation indices of scientific publications of members of the national academy of sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic

Authors

  • Omorov R.O.

Keywords:

scientometrics, copyrights, Hirsch index, modifications of scientometric indices, Hirsch index “plus”, RSCI databases, Scopus and Web of Sciences, co-authors of scientific publications, author’s index averaging coefficient

Abstract

As is known, various indicators are used to assess the scientific productivity of scientists and specialists in scientometrics, the most common of which is the Hirsch index or h-index, which is calculated based on citations of works included in a certain database. For the CIS countries, an important publication database is the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) database. In the international plan, the Scopus and Web of Sciences databases are widely used. The Hirsch index shows the comparative efficiency of the work of a scientist or a team of scientists. But as is easy to see, according to the indicators of calculating the Hirsch index based on the RSCI databases, for individual scientists, their contribution and participation in collective publications and their citations are not taken into account. Relations between co-authors of collective publications are determined on the basis of an agreement, in the absence of which the copyright for the publication is exercised by all co-authors jointly, and the remuneration is distributed between them equally. It is proposed to introduce a modified Hirsch index, called the Hirsch index “plus” or h+, to assess the individual citation index of scientists’ publications. It is calculated by dividing the usual number of citations of a specific publication by the number of co-authors of the cited publication, which will not cause difficulties in calculating the h+ indices using the algorithm for determining the Hirsch index itself. Such an indicator takes into account the interests of co-authors in terms of copyright, in comparative assessments of their work. Also, to assess the individual citation indices of scientists, it is proposed to introduce the author’s averaging coefficient of indices – kc, equal to the cube root of the total number of co-authors, by which the corresponding Hirsch index or other citation index of a specific author is divided. The article also provides comparative estimates of the Hirsch indices, Hirsch “plus” and these indices taking into account the averaging coefficients of members of the National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic according to the RSCI and Scopus data.

References

Налимов В.В., Мульченко З.М. Наукометрия: изучение развития науки как информа- ционного процесса. – М.: Наука, 1969. – 192 с.

Грановский Ю.В., Дрогалина Ж.А., Маркова Е.В. В.В. Налимов и российская науко- метрия // Науковедческие исследования. 2014. № 2014. С. 80-91.

Hirsch, J.E. (15 November 2005). “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output”. PNAS 102 (46): 16569 – 16572.

Михайлов О.В. Новая версия индекса Хирша – j-индекс // Вестник Российской ака- демии наук. 2014. Т. 84, № 6. С. 532-535.

Герасименко П.В. Модификации индекса Хирша для дифференцированной оценки результатов творческой деятельности ученых // Управление наукой и наукометрия. 2020. Т. 15, № 1. С. 55-71.

Оморов Р.О., Роман А. Введение в интеллектуальную собственность в Кыргызской Республике. Изд. 2-е. – Бишкек: Илим, 2016. – 388 с.

Оморов Р.О. Индекс Хирша в наукометрии и показатели цитируемости трудов членов НАН КР по базам данных РИНЦ // Известия НАН КР. 2017. №1. С. 5-9.

Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index // Scientometrics. 2006. Vol. 69, no 1. P. 131-152.

Egghe L. Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008. Vol. 59, no 6. P. 1608-1616.

Петров А.Н. Новый показатель оценки научно-публикационной эффективности на основе наукометрических параметров базы РИНЦ // Социология науки и технологий. 2019. Т. 10, № 4. С. 176-192.

Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship // Scientometrics. 2010. Vol. 85, no 3. P. 741-754.

Batista P.D., Campiteli M.G., Kinouchi O., Martineⱬ A.S. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? // Scientometrics. 2006. Vol. 68, no 1. P. 179-189.

Shtovba S., Shtovba E. Simple Rational Extension of Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks // Sociology of science and Technology. 2013. Vol. 4, no 4. P. 99-103.

Михайлов О.В. Нужна модификация самого популярного индекса цитируемости // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2013. Т. 83, № 10. С. 943-944.

Михайлов О.В. О возможной модификации индексов Хирша и Эгга с учетом соавторства // Социология науки и технологий. 2014. Т. 5, № 3. С. 48-56.

Оморов Р.О. Правовые аспекты применения индексов и электронного управления при оценке публикационной активности ученых // E-Management. 2020. № 3. С. 13-19.

Оморов Р.О. Оценка публикационной активности ученых: индексы цитирования // Право интеллектуальной собственности. 2021. № 3(65). – С. 24-27

Оморов Р.О. Авторские права и индексы цитирования на научные публикации ученых и специалистов // Труды по интеллектуальной собственности. 2024. Т. 49, № 2. – С. 82-88.

Published

2025-01-25